Film and television majors spend big on stock buybacks
rankings
Lionsgate
stock buybackseconomic impact | wealth concentration
1/10
Netflix
stock buybackseconomic impact | wealth concentration
2/10
Paramount Global
stock buybackseconomic impact | wealth concentration
3/10
Warner Bros. Discovery
stock buybackseconomic impact | wealth concentration
4/10
Fox Corporation
stock buybackseconomic impact | wealth concentration
5/10
Disney
stock buybackseconomic impact | wealth concentration
6/10
Sony
stock buybackseconomic impact | wealth concentration
7/10
Amazon
stock buybackseconomic impact | wealth concentration
8/10
Comcast
stock buybackseconomic impact | wealth concentration
9/10
Apple
stock buybackseconomic impact | wealth concentration
10/10
about this industry
Stock Repurchases Methodology
During the 1980s in the United States it became legal for publicly traded companies to repurchase or buyback their own stock. Prior to this, stock buybacks were considered a form of self-dealing that would encourage company executives, often compensated with stock, to deploy less capital in investments and workers and more capital into temporarily inflating their company’s stock. Since stock buybacks became legal in the US, capital investments made by publicly traded corporations have steadily declined, workers wages have not kept up with profitability all while buybacks have steadily increased.
In the United States, publicly traded corporations are required to report the amount they spend repurchasing their own company stock to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). These SEC-reported repurchase figures represent publicly accessible, directly measurable and independently verified data points for inclusion in a Spendwell ranking. This data is typically reported at a corporation’s fiscal year end. This Spendwell ranking is predicated on the values-based statement that a corporation should spend less on buying back its own stock.
Corporations that spend less money repurchasing their own stock rank higher than those spending more on buybacks. In order to account for fluctuations in annual income, board repurchase approvals and other variances, Spendwell reports on the last five available years of a company’s repurchase history.
In some reporting instances, Spendwell’s rankings will include private companies which will have no stock repurchase information. Private companies do not repurchase stock and will be ranked accordingly. All corporations with accessible buyback information are ranked based on the previously mentioned data reported to the SEC through end-of-year or annual reports, which can be accessed through the SEC’s Edgar search tool here:
Search for a company by name to view its filed 10-k reports.
For Spendwell's ranking purposes, stock buyback data is considered and compared to other companies based on the year in which a fiscal year actually ends, which is not necessarily the company's reported or designated fiscal year.
Stock Repurchases Methodology
During the 1980s in the United States it became legal for publicly traded companies to repurchase or buyback their own stock. Prior to this, stock buybacks were considered a form of self-dealing that would encourage company executives, often compensated with stock, to deploy less capital in investments and workers and more capital into temporarily inflating their company’s stock. Since stock buybacks became legal in the US, capital investments made by publicly traded corporations have steadily declined, workers wages have not kept up with profitability all while buybacks have steadily increased.
In the United States, publicly traded corporations are required to report the amount they spend repurchasing their own company stock to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). These SEC-reported repurchase figures represent publicly accessible, directly measurable and independently verified data points for inclusion in a Spendwell ranking. This data is typically reported at a corporation’s fiscal year end. This Spendwell ranking is predicated on the values-based statement that a corporation should spend less on buying back its own stock.
Corporations that spend less money repurchasing their own stock rank higher than those spending more on buybacks. In order to account for fluctuations in annual income, board repurchase approvals and other variances, Spendwell reports on the last five available years of a company’s repurchase history.
In some reporting instances, Spendwell’s rankings will include private companies which will have no stock repurchase information. Private companies do not repurchase stock and will be ranked accordingly. All corporations with accessible buyback information are ranked based on the previously mentioned data reported to the SEC through end-of-year or annual reports, which can be accessed through the SEC’s Edgar search tool here:
Search for a company by name to view its filed 10-k reports.
For Spendwell's ranking purposes, stock buyback data is considered and compared to other companies based on the year in which a fiscal year actually ends, which is not necessarily the company's reported or designated fiscal year.
Ranking
rankings
Lionsgate
stock buybackseconomic impact | wealth concentration
1/10
Netflix
stock buybackseconomic impact | wealth concentration
2/10
Paramount Global
stock buybackseconomic impact | wealth concentration
3/10
Warner Bros. Discovery
stock buybackseconomic impact | wealth concentration
4/10
Fox Corporation
stock buybackseconomic impact | wealth concentration
5/10
Disney
stock buybackseconomic impact | wealth concentration
6/10
Sony
stock buybackseconomic impact | wealth concentration
7/10
Amazon
stock buybackseconomic impact | wealth concentration
8/10
Comcast
stock buybackseconomic impact | wealth concentration
9/10
Apple
stock buybackseconomic impact | wealth concentration
10/10
Report Disclaimer
Spendwell is a corporate accountability-focused investigative media group that sources all data used in its rankings and reports through government regulatory entities, recognized nongovernmental organizations, news media and independently verifiable company self-reporting. The veracity of this information is generally excellent, but is reliant, in most instances, on information provided by companies to regulators, NGOs, media and the public. Spendwell disclaims any liability arising from use of Spendwell’s reporting, rankings or any other content on spendwell.com or otherwise provided by Spendwell. Spendwell does not provide investment advice; therefore, nothing on Spendwell.com or content otherwise provided by Spendwell should be construed as an offering of investment advice. If you believe information reported by Spendwell or included in one of Spendwell’s reports or rankings is inaccurate, please contact Spendwell through the report or ranking in question in order to request an investigation and/or editorial correction.If you believe this report needs a correction or update, please let Spendwell know.
If you are media or have other questions regarding this report, please contact Spendwell.
Clicking either of these buttons will open your default email client.