World’s 425 Largest Companies Failing to Set Independently Verifiable Climate Targets
rankings
For all Spendwell rankings, companies having the least negative impact on people and our planet, rank first. You can find details on how Spendwell ranks each value in the Methodology section of this report.
The ↗ symbol indicates a company ranked here links to its detailed company report.
Companies committing to more independently verifiable action to mitigate their negative impact on the climate rank higher.
- AstraZeneca has set a 100% renewable energy target through RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2025
- AstraZeneca has committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- AstraZeneca has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- AstraZeneca has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2045
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by AstraZeneca are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including AstraZeneca, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 650
- Deutsche Telekom has set a 100% renewable energy target through RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2021
- Deutsche Telekom has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Deutsche Telekom has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Deutsche Telekom has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2040
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by Deutsche Telekom are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Deutsche Telekom, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 629
- Vodafone has committed to 100% renewable electricity through both Science Based Targets and RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2025
- Vodafone has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Vodafone has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Vodafone has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2040
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by Vodafone are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Vodafone, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 625
- Cisco Systems has set a 100% renewable energy target through RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2030
- Cisco Systems has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Cisco Systems has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Cisco Systems has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2040
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by Cisco Systems are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Cisco Systems, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 620
- Maersk Group has set a 100% renewable energy target through Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2030
- Maersk Group has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Maersk Group has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Maersk Group has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2040
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by Maersk Group are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Maersk Group, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 620
- Sony has set a 100% renewable energy target through RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2030
- Sony has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Sony has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Sony has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2040
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by Sony are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Sony, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 620
- GSK has set a 100% renewable energy target through RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2025
- GSK has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- GSK has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- GSK has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2045
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by GSK are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including GSK, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 600
- Sanofi has committed to 100% renewable electricity through both Science Based Targets and RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2030
- Sanofi has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Sanofi has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Sanofi has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2045
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by Sanofi are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Sanofi, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 595
- Nestlé has committed to 100% renewable electricity through both Science Based Targets and RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2025
- Nestlé has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Nestlé has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Nestlé has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2050
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by Nestlé are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Nestlé, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 575
- Tesco has set a 100% renewable energy target through RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2030
- Tesco has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Tesco has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Tesco has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2050
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by Tesco are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Tesco, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 570
- Iberdrola has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- Iberdrola has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Iberdrola has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Iberdrola has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2039
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by Iberdrola are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Iberdrola, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 555
**Spendwell categorizes Enel as a utility that plays an active role in the production or distribution of fossil fuels. However, SBTi does not categorize Enel as a fossil fuel company. Read more about SBTi's fossil fuel industry categorization by following this link.
- Enel has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- Enel has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Enel has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Enel has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2040
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by Enel are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Enel, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 550
- Qualcomm has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- Qualcomm has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Qualcomm has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Qualcomm has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2040
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by Qualcomm are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Qualcomm, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 550
- Telefónica has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- Telefónica has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Telefónica has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Telefónica has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2040
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by Telefónica are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Telefónica, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 550
- CVS has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- CVS has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- CVS has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- CVS has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2050
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by CVS are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including CVS, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 500
- Lenovo has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- Lenovo has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Lenovo has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Lenovo has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2050
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by Lenovo are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Lenovo, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 500
- Magna International has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- Magna International has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Magna International has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Magna International has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2050
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by Magna International are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Magna International, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 500
- Sainsbury's has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- Sainsbury's has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Sainsbury's has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Sainsbury's has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2050
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by Sainsbury's are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Sainsbury's, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 500
- Saint-Gobain has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- Saint-Gobain has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Saint-Gobain has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Saint-Gobain has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2050
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by Saint-Gobain are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Saint-Gobain, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 500
- Thermo Fisher has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- Thermo Fisher has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Thermo Fisher has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Thermo Fisher has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2050
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by Thermo Fisher are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Thermo Fisher, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 500
- COSCO Shipping has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- COSCO Shipping has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- COSCO Shipping has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2
- COSCO Shipping has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2050
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by COSCO Shipping are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including COSCO Shipping, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 475
- AB InBev has committed to 100% renewable electricity through both Science Based Targets and RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2025
- AB InBev has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- AB InBev has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by AB InBev are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- AB InBev has committed to setting net-zero Science Based Targets, but has yet to have any targets approved.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including AB InBev, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 425
- AEON has set a 100% renewable energy target through RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2030
- AEON has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- AEON has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by AEON are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- AEON has committed to setting net-zero Science Based Targets, but has yet to have any targets approved.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including AEON, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 420
- Pfizer has committed to 100% renewable electricity through both Science Based Targets and RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2030
- Pfizer has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Pfizer has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by Pfizer are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Pfizer has committed to setting net-zero Science Based Targets, but has yet to have any targets approved.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Pfizer, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 420
- SoftBank Group has set a 100% renewable energy target through RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2040
- SoftBank Group has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- SoftBank Group has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by SoftBank Group are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- SoftBank Group has committed to setting net-zero Science Based Targets, but has yet to have any targets approved.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including SoftBank Group, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 410
- KDDI has set a 100% renewable energy target through RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2050
- KDDI has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- KDDI has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by KDDI are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- KDDI has committed to setting net-zero Science Based Targets, but has yet to have any targets approved.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including KDDI, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 400
- Panasonic has set a 100% renewable energy target through RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2050
- Panasonic has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Panasonic has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by Panasonic are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Panasonic has committed to setting net-zero Science Based Targets, but has yet to have any targets approved.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Panasonic, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 400
- Novartis has set a 100% renewable energy target through RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2025
- Novartis has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Novartis has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by Novartis are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to Well-below 2°C.
- Novartis has committed to setting net-zero Science Based Targets, but has yet to have any targets approved.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Novartis, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 375
- Hitachi has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- Hitachi has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Hitachi has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by Hitachi are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Hitachi has committed to setting net-zero Science Based Targets, but has yet to have any targets approved.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Hitachi, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 350
- Merck has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- Merck has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Merck has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by Merck are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Merck has committed to setting net-zero Science Based Targets, but has yet to have any targets approved.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Merck, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 350
- Apple has committed to 100% renewable electricity through both Science Based Targets and RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2021
- Apple has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Apple has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by Apple are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Apple has not made a commitment to net-zero with Science Based Targets.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Apple, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 329
- IKEA (Ingka Group) has set a 100% renewable energy target through RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2025
- IKEA (Ingka Group) has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- IKEA (Ingka Group) has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by IKEA (Ingka Group) are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- IKEA (Ingka Group) has not made a commitment to net-zero with Science Based Targets.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including IKEA (Ingka Group), might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 325
- Nike has set a 100% renewable energy target through RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2025
- Nike has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Nike has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by Nike are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Nike has not made a commitment to net-zero with Science Based Targets.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Nike, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 325
- AbbVie has set a 100% renewable energy target through Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2030
- AbbVie has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- AbbVie has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by AbbVie are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- AbbVie has not made a commitment to net-zero with Science Based Targets.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including AbbVie, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 320
- Denso has set a 100% renewable energy target through Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2030
- Denso has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Denso has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by Denso are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Denso has not made a commitment to net-zero with Science Based Targets.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Denso, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 320
- Home Depot has set a 100% renewable energy target through RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2030
- Home Depot has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Home Depot has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by Home Depot are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Home Depot has not made a commitment to net-zero with Science Based Targets.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Home Depot, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 320
- Robert Bosch has set a 100% renewable energy target through Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2030
- Robert Bosch has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Robert Bosch has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by Robert Bosch are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Robert Bosch has not made a commitment to net-zero with Science Based Targets.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Robert Bosch, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 320
- Continental AG has set a 100% renewable energy target through RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2040
- Continental AG has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Continental AG has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by Continental AG are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Continental AG has not made a commitment to net-zero with Science Based Targets.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Continental AG, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 310
- KB Financial Group has set a 100% renewable energy target through RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2040
- KB Financial Group has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- KB Financial Group has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by KB Financial Group are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- KB Financial Group has not made a commitment to net-zero with Science Based Targets.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including KB Financial Group, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 310
- NTT Group has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- NTT Group has committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- NTT Group has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by NTT Group are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- NTT Group has not made a commitment to net-zero with Science Based Targets.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including NTT Group, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 300
- ThyssenKrupp has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- ThyssenKrupp has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- ThyssenKrupp has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by ThyssenKrupp are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to Well-below 2°C.
- ThyssenKrupp has committed to setting net-zero Science Based Targets, but has yet to have any targets approved.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including ThyssenKrupp, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 300
- General Motors has set a 100% renewable energy target through RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2035
- General Motors has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- General Motors has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by General Motors are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C/Well-below 2°C.
- General Motors committed to develop and verify net-zero Science Based Targets through the Business Ambition for 1.5°C program when SBTi has a developed net-zero standard for this sector. Companies with commitments that are more than two years old receive no points from Spendwell for this climate ranking, no matter the reason for target setting delay.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
*Companies like General Motors that have been granted extensions for net-zero target setting are noted as committed, but receive no points for this commitment. SBTi has not finalized its net-zero standards for this company's business sector or the company was granted an extension for other reasons.
Some corporations, including General Motors, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 265
- Airbus has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- Airbus has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Airbus has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by Airbus are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Airbus has not made a commitment to net-zero with Science Based Targets.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Airbus, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 250
- Albertsons has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- Albertsons has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Albertsons has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by Albertsons are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Albertsons has not made a commitment to net-zero with Science Based Targets.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Albertsons, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 250
- ALDI has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- ALDI has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- ALDI has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by ALDI are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- ALDI has not made a commitment to net-zero with Science Based Targets.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including ALDI, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 250
- AT&T has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- AT&T has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- AT&T has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by AT&T are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- AT&T has not made a commitment to net-zero with Science Based Targets.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including AT&T, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 250
- Best Buy has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- Best Buy has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Best Buy has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by Best Buy are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Best Buy has not made a commitment to net-zero with Science Based Targets.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Best Buy, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 250
- BMW has set a 100% renewable energy target through RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2050
- BMW has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- BMW has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by BMW are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C/Well-below 2°C.
- BMW committed to develop and verify net-zero Science Based Targets through the Business Ambition for 1.5°C program when SBTi has a developed net-zero standard for this sector. Companies with commitments that are more than two years old receive no points from Spendwell for this climate ranking, no matter the reason for target setting delay.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
*Companies like BMW that have been granted extensions for net-zero target setting are noted as committed, but receive no points for this commitment. SBTi has not finalized its net-zero standards for this company's business sector or the company was granted an extension for other reasons.
Some corporations, including BMW, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 250
- Cardinal Health has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- Cardinal Health has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Cardinal Health has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by Cardinal Health are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Cardinal Health has not made a commitment to net-zero with Science Based Targets.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Cardinal Health, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 250
- Cencora has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- Cencora has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Cencora has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by Cencora are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Cencora has not made a commitment to net-zero with Science Based Targets.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Cencora, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 250
Summary
This report compares the 425 largest companies in the world* on climate crisis action and leadership, measured through participation in the independent Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) as well as Climate Group’s RE100 and EP100 initiatives. Companies making more and better commitments and setting more and better independently verifiable targets, rank higher.
- Just 21 of the world's 425 largest companies have set net-zero targets with the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), the collaborative climate commitment program supported by the United Nations. Another 25 companies have active commitments to set net-zero targets with SBTi.
- Conversely, 14 of these 425 companies committed to setting net-zero targets with SBTi, but have failed to achieve approved targets within the commitment time frame (a minimum of 2 years) and have been removed from SBTi’s net-zero commitment list.
- 25 companies committed to having net-zero targets verified by SBTi through the Business Ambition for 1.5°C initiative or after, but failed to meet agreed-to deadlines for target verification and are still without approved targets.
- 107 companies have managed to set near-term targets with SBTi. 10 companies failed to set near-term targets by the agreed-to deadline and were removed from SBTi’s commitment list.
- 71 of these companies have made a commitment to 100% renewable energy through Science Based Targets or Climate Group’s RE100 initiative.
- Only 5 companies have set energy efficiency targets with Climate Group’s EP100 initiative.
March, 2024: the monthly atmospheric concentration of CO₂ averaged above 425 ppm for the first time in human history as measured by NOAA at Mauna Loa.
*The 425 largest companies in the world based on publicly available revenue data or data made available to Spendwell. In some instances, globally important companies experiencing rapid growth but without updated revenue figures are included. Spendwell's rankings include private companies: partnerships, mutuals, employee owned enterprises and cooperatives with publicly reported revenue figures that can be reasonably expected to be accurate.
Ranking Methodology
This Spendwell ranking is predicated on the values-based statement a company should do all that it can to address and ultimately reverse its negative impact on the global climate. Most individual value rankings reported by Spendwell consist of a singular data point or a combination of like data points over set time periods (e.g., executive pay in each of the last 3 years, averaged). Measuring climate and other environmental impacts is significantly more complex.
Adding to this complexity is the third criteria for inclusion of a data point in any individual Spendwell value ranking: the data point should be independently verified. Typically, data points are derived from a company's self-reporting to regulatory bodies. In some instances, data is self-reported to independent, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and entities committed to transparency and truth-telling. Measurable climate data points are almost exclusively reported to the latter, complicating the process of compiling a value ranking, as nongovernmental bodies rarely have regulatory authority (e.g., the ability to require self-reporting). Fortunately, public interest in corporate climate impact has fostered a robust, independent NGO-based reporting system that Spendwell can tap into and distill data for publicly accessible, directly measurable and independently verified data points.
Two active climate accountability initiatives are currently reported by Spendwell and included in Spendwell’s initial climate impact value rankings:
- The Climate Group’s RE100 and EP100 programs focused on renewable energy consumption and efficiency, respectively, and
- The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), an independent corporate climate action commitment and measurement effort supported by CDP, the United Nations Global Compact, World Resources Institute and the World Wide Fund for Nature. SBTi is focused on renewable energy, near-term, and net-zero commitments and targets.
Both of these initiatives meet Spendwell’s value-ranking criteria and both demonstrate corporate climate commitment to action. Just as important, these initiatives represent two of the only cross-industry, independent climate change-reporting efforts active on a global scale.
The RE100, EP100 and SBTi initiatives require significant commitments to action by corporations and both involve rigorous, scientifically guided and independently approved goal- and target-setting. Both initiatives produce numerically comparative data points representing corporate commitment to positive climate impacts, level of positive impact attainment, and generally a time-frame for achieving those positive impacts. An approved RE100 commitment or an SBTi renewable electricity commitment consists of a target year for attaining 100% renewable energy consumption. EP100 commitments generally involve a target year, but this varies widely by company and industry. Similarly, an approved SBTi net-zero target consists of a target year for attaining net-zero. SBTi committed targets are assessed by SBTi to align with one of three levels of progressively positive climate impact: an impact level consistent with a “2 degrees Celsius” rise in global temperatures, a “well-below 2 C” rise, or a “1.5 C” or less rise. Points for ranking these complex commitments and targets are as follows:
Renewable Energy
Spendwell assigns a company 50 points for participation in the RE100 initiative or the SBTi renewable electricity target. Companies are awarded a point for each year a 100% renewable energy target is sooner than 2050. For example, if a company's RE100 target year is 2025, they will be awarded 25 bonus points. In the event a company has committed to both initiatives, Spendwell uses only the data from the initiative with the earliest target year.Energy Efficiency
Spendwell assigns a company 50 points for participation in the EP100 initiative, but because of the significant variation in target years depending on company, industry, and more, Spendwell does not award bonus points for target year nearness.Near-term
A company gets 25 points for committing to set near-term Science Based Targets. Spendwell does not count commitments to the SBTi version of Business Ambition for 1.5°C unless companies have already set targets. The Business Ambition for 1.5°C commitment initiative closed for commitments over 3 years ago. For more information, see SBTi's final report on its Business Ambition for 1.5°C program.- A company gets 25 points each for setting near-term Scope 1, 2 or 3 Science Based Targets.
- A company gets 50 points for setting Science-Based Targets that align with “2 degrees” of warming, 100 points for targets aligned with “well-below 2 degrees” of warming or 150 points for targets aligned with “1.5 degrees Celsius” of warming.
Net-zero
Companies committing to set net-zero targets with SBTi get 100 points and an additional 150 points when their net-zero targets are approved. Additionally, companies are awarded 5 points for each year a net-zero target is sooner than 2050. For example, if a company’s target year is 2040, they will be awarded 50 bonus points.Missed Deadlines & Removal
If a company, including its subsidiaries and overseas operations, misses an agreed to deadline for target verification or is removed from the Climate Group or SBTi's commitment list(s) for failure to set or reach approved targets, the company will lose 500 points and any points associated with previously made commitments and/or targets tied to the removed commitment. This includes companies that made Business Ambition for 1.5°C net-zero commitments, but failed to follow through with verification through SBTi. Certain companies, such as financial institutions and certain automobile industry companies, have been granted target setting extensions by SBTi. Spendwell does not currently penalize these companies for having missed target setting dates, but does not grant them commitment points. For more information on these exceptions, see SBTi's commitment compliance policy.Please note: when SBTi notified committed companies in early 2023 about the above compliance policy, SBTi also let companies rescind commitments. If a company made a commitment through the Business Ambition for 1.5°C program, Spendwell's ranking includes that original commitment whether or not it was rescinded during SBTi's commitment compliance policy notice period.
Fossil Fuel Companies
Companies Spendwell classifies as belonging to the fossil fuel industry with no active commitments or targets tracked by Spendwell, lose 500 points. For Spendwell, fossil fuel companies are those actively involved in the production or distribution of fossil fuels. Utilities that consume fossil fuels, but do not produce or distribute them in significant ways are not considered fossil fuel companies for Spendwell's rankings.
You can find out more about each of these independent, science-led climate initiatives through the following links:
The point system used in this ranking was developed by Spendwell in order to weight the importance of each commitment and target.
This ranking is currently focused on independently verifiable climate action commitments and targets. Future updates to this ranking will include measuring a company's transparency regarding its targets as well as demonstrated or verifiable action taken to make those commitments and targets, real and meaningful.
Ranking Methodology
This Spendwell ranking is predicated on the values-based statement a company should do all that it can to address and ultimately reverse its negative impact on the global climate. Most individual value rankings reported by Spendwell consist of a singular data point or a combination of like data points over set time periods (e.g., executive pay in each of the last 3 years, averaged). Measuring climate and other environmental impacts is significantly more complex.
Adding to this complexity is the third criteria for inclusion of a data point in any individual Spendwell value ranking: the data point should be independently verified. Typically, data points are derived from a company's self-reporting to regulatory bodies. In some instances, data is self-reported to independent, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and entities committed to transparency and truth-telling. Measurable climate data points are almost exclusively reported to the latter, complicating the process of compiling a value ranking, as nongovernmental bodies rarely have regulatory authority (e.g., the ability to require self-reporting). Fortunately, public interest in corporate climate impact has fostered a robust, independent NGO-based reporting system that Spendwell can tap into and distill data for publicly accessible, directly measurable and independently verified data points.
Two active climate accountability initiatives are currently reported by Spendwell and included in Spendwell’s initial climate impact value rankings:
- The Climate Group’s RE100 and EP100 programs focused on renewable energy consumption and efficiency, respectively, and
- The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), an independent corporate climate action commitment and measurement effort supported by CDP, the United Nations Global Compact, World Resources Institute and the World Wide Fund for Nature. SBTi is focused on renewable energy, near-term, and net-zero commitments and targets.
Both of these initiatives meet Spendwell’s value-ranking criteria and both demonstrate corporate climate commitment to action. Just as important, these initiatives represent two of the only cross-industry, independent climate change-reporting efforts active on a global scale.
The RE100, EP100 and SBTi initiatives require significant commitments to action by corporations and both involve rigorous, scientifically guided and independently approved goal- and target-setting. Both initiatives produce numerically comparative data points representing corporate commitment to positive climate impacts, level of positive impact attainment, and generally a time-frame for achieving those positive impacts. An approved RE100 commitment or an SBTi renewable electricity commitment consists of a target year for attaining 100% renewable energy consumption. EP100 commitments generally involve a target year, but this varies widely by company and industry. Similarly, an approved SBTi net-zero target consists of a target year for attaining net-zero. SBTi committed targets are assessed by SBTi to align with one of three levels of progressively positive climate impact: an impact level consistent with a “2 degrees Celsius” rise in global temperatures, a “well-below 2 C” rise, or a “1.5 C” or less rise. Points for ranking these complex commitments and targets are as follows:
Renewable Energy
Spendwell assigns a company 50 points for participation in the RE100 initiative or the SBTi renewable electricity target. Companies are awarded a point for each year a 100% renewable energy target is sooner than 2050. For example, if a company's RE100 target year is 2025, they will be awarded 25 bonus points. In the event a company has committed to both initiatives, Spendwell uses only the data from the initiative with the earliest target year.Energy Efficiency
Spendwell assigns a company 50 points for participation in the EP100 initiative, but because of the significant variation in target years depending on company, industry, and more, Spendwell does not award bonus points for target year nearness.Near-term
A company gets 25 points for committing to set near-term Science Based Targets. Spendwell does not count commitments to the SBTi version of Business Ambition for 1.5°C unless companies have already set targets. The Business Ambition for 1.5°C commitment initiative closed for commitments over 3 years ago. For more information, see SBTi's final report on its Business Ambition for 1.5°C program.- A company gets 25 points each for setting near-term Scope 1, 2 or 3 Science Based Targets.
- A company gets 50 points for setting Science-Based Targets that align with “2 degrees” of warming, 100 points for targets aligned with “well-below 2 degrees” of warming or 150 points for targets aligned with “1.5 degrees Celsius” of warming.
Net-zero
Companies committing to set net-zero targets with SBTi get 100 points and an additional 150 points when their net-zero targets are approved. Additionally, companies are awarded 5 points for each year a net-zero target is sooner than 2050. For example, if a company’s target year is 2040, they will be awarded 50 bonus points.Missed Deadlines & Removal
If a company, including its subsidiaries and overseas operations, misses an agreed to deadline for target verification or is removed from the Climate Group or SBTi's commitment list(s) for failure to set or reach approved targets, the company will lose 500 points and any points associated with previously made commitments and/or targets tied to the removed commitment. This includes companies that made Business Ambition for 1.5°C net-zero commitments, but failed to follow through with verification through SBTi. Certain companies, such as financial institutions and certain automobile industry companies, have been granted target setting extensions by SBTi. Spendwell does not currently penalize these companies for having missed target setting dates, but does not grant them commitment points. For more information on these exceptions, see SBTi's commitment compliance policy.Please note: when SBTi notified committed companies in early 2023 about the above compliance policy, SBTi also let companies rescind commitments. If a company made a commitment through the Business Ambition for 1.5°C program, Spendwell's ranking includes that original commitment whether or not it was rescinded during SBTi's commitment compliance policy notice period.
Fossil Fuel Companies
Companies Spendwell classifies as belonging to the fossil fuel industry with no active commitments or targets tracked by Spendwell, lose 500 points. For Spendwell, fossil fuel companies are those actively involved in the production or distribution of fossil fuels. Utilities that consume fossil fuels, but do not produce or distribute them in significant ways are not considered fossil fuel companies for Spendwell's rankings.
You can find out more about each of these independent, science-led climate initiatives through the following links:
The point system used in this ranking was developed by Spendwell in order to weight the importance of each commitment and target.
This ranking is currently focused on independently verifiable climate action commitments and targets. Future updates to this ranking will include measuring a company's transparency regarding its targets as well as demonstrated or verifiable action taken to make those commitments and targets, real and meaningful.
Ranking
rankings
For all Spendwell rankings, companies having the least negative impact on people and our planet, rank first. You can find details on how Spendwell ranks each value in the Methodology section of this report.
The ↗ symbol indicates a company ranked here links to its detailed company report.
Companies committing to more independently verifiable action to mitigate their negative impact on the climate rank higher.
- AstraZeneca has set a 100% renewable energy target through RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2025
- AstraZeneca has committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- AstraZeneca has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- AstraZeneca has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2045
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by AstraZeneca are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including AstraZeneca, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 650
- Deutsche Telekom has set a 100% renewable energy target through RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2021
- Deutsche Telekom has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Deutsche Telekom has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Deutsche Telekom has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2040
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by Deutsche Telekom are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Deutsche Telekom, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 629
- Vodafone has committed to 100% renewable electricity through both Science Based Targets and RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2025
- Vodafone has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Vodafone has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Vodafone has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2040
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by Vodafone are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Vodafone, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 625
- Cisco Systems has set a 100% renewable energy target through RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2030
- Cisco Systems has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Cisco Systems has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Cisco Systems has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2040
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by Cisco Systems are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Cisco Systems, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 620
- Maersk Group has set a 100% renewable energy target through Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2030
- Maersk Group has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Maersk Group has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Maersk Group has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2040
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by Maersk Group are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Maersk Group, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 620
- Sony has set a 100% renewable energy target through RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2030
- Sony has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Sony has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Sony has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2040
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by Sony are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Sony, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 620
- GSK has set a 100% renewable energy target through RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2025
- GSK has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- GSK has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- GSK has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2045
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by GSK are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including GSK, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 600
- Sanofi has committed to 100% renewable electricity through both Science Based Targets and RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2030
- Sanofi has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Sanofi has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Sanofi has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2045
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by Sanofi are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Sanofi, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 595
- Nestlé has committed to 100% renewable electricity through both Science Based Targets and RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2025
- Nestlé has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Nestlé has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Nestlé has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2050
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by Nestlé are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Nestlé, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 575
- Tesco has set a 100% renewable energy target through RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2030
- Tesco has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Tesco has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Tesco has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2050
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by Tesco are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Tesco, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 570
- Iberdrola has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- Iberdrola has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Iberdrola has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Iberdrola has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2039
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by Iberdrola are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Iberdrola, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 555
**Spendwell categorizes Enel as a utility that plays an active role in the production or distribution of fossil fuels. However, SBTi does not categorize Enel as a fossil fuel company. Read more about SBTi's fossil fuel industry categorization by following this link.
- Enel has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- Enel has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Enel has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Enel has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2040
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by Enel are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Enel, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 550
- Qualcomm has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- Qualcomm has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Qualcomm has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Qualcomm has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2040
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by Qualcomm are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Qualcomm, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 550
- Telefónica has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- Telefónica has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Telefónica has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Telefónica has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2040
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by Telefónica are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Telefónica, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 550
- CVS has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- CVS has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- CVS has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- CVS has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2050
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by CVS are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including CVS, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 500
- Lenovo has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- Lenovo has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Lenovo has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Lenovo has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2050
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by Lenovo are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Lenovo, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 500
- Magna International has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- Magna International has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Magna International has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Magna International has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2050
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by Magna International are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Magna International, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 500
- Sainsbury's has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- Sainsbury's has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Sainsbury's has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Sainsbury's has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2050
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by Sainsbury's are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Sainsbury's, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 500
- Saint-Gobain has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- Saint-Gobain has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Saint-Gobain has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Saint-Gobain has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2050
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by Saint-Gobain are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Saint-Gobain, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 500
- Thermo Fisher has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- Thermo Fisher has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Thermo Fisher has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Thermo Fisher has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2050
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by Thermo Fisher are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Thermo Fisher, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 500
- COSCO Shipping has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- COSCO Shipping has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- COSCO Shipping has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2
- COSCO Shipping has set approved net-zero Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2050
- Science Based Targets has assessed the commitments and targets set by COSCO Shipping are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including COSCO Shipping, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 475
- AB InBev has committed to 100% renewable electricity through both Science Based Targets and RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2025
- AB InBev has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- AB InBev has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by AB InBev are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- AB InBev has committed to setting net-zero Science Based Targets, but has yet to have any targets approved.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including AB InBev, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 425
- AEON has set a 100% renewable energy target through RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2030
- AEON has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- AEON has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by AEON are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- AEON has committed to setting net-zero Science Based Targets, but has yet to have any targets approved.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including AEON, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 420
- Pfizer has committed to 100% renewable electricity through both Science Based Targets and RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2030
- Pfizer has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Pfizer has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by Pfizer are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Pfizer has committed to setting net-zero Science Based Targets, but has yet to have any targets approved.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Pfizer, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 420
- SoftBank Group has set a 100% renewable energy target through RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2040
- SoftBank Group has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- SoftBank Group has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by SoftBank Group are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- SoftBank Group has committed to setting net-zero Science Based Targets, but has yet to have any targets approved.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including SoftBank Group, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 410
- KDDI has set a 100% renewable energy target through RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2050
- KDDI has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- KDDI has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by KDDI are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- KDDI has committed to setting net-zero Science Based Targets, but has yet to have any targets approved.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including KDDI, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 400
- Panasonic has set a 100% renewable energy target through RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2050
- Panasonic has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Panasonic has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by Panasonic are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Panasonic has committed to setting net-zero Science Based Targets, but has yet to have any targets approved.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Panasonic, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 400
- Novartis has set a 100% renewable energy target through RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2025
- Novartis has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Novartis has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by Novartis are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to Well-below 2°C.
- Novartis has committed to setting net-zero Science Based Targets, but has yet to have any targets approved.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Novartis, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 375
- Hitachi has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- Hitachi has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Hitachi has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by Hitachi are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Hitachi has committed to setting net-zero Science Based Targets, but has yet to have any targets approved.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Hitachi, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 350
- Merck has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- Merck has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Merck has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by Merck are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Merck has committed to setting net-zero Science Based Targets, but has yet to have any targets approved.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Merck, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 350
- Apple has committed to 100% renewable electricity through both Science Based Targets and RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2021
- Apple has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Apple has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by Apple are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Apple has not made a commitment to net-zero with Science Based Targets.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Apple, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 329
- IKEA (Ingka Group) has set a 100% renewable energy target through RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2025
- IKEA (Ingka Group) has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- IKEA (Ingka Group) has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by IKEA (Ingka Group) are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- IKEA (Ingka Group) has not made a commitment to net-zero with Science Based Targets.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including IKEA (Ingka Group), might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 325
- Nike has set a 100% renewable energy target through RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2025
- Nike has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Nike has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by Nike are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Nike has not made a commitment to net-zero with Science Based Targets.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Nike, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 325
- AbbVie has set a 100% renewable energy target through Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2030
- AbbVie has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- AbbVie has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by AbbVie are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- AbbVie has not made a commitment to net-zero with Science Based Targets.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including AbbVie, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 320
- Denso has set a 100% renewable energy target through Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2030
- Denso has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Denso has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by Denso are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Denso has not made a commitment to net-zero with Science Based Targets.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Denso, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 320
- Home Depot has set a 100% renewable energy target through RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2030
- Home Depot has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Home Depot has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by Home Depot are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Home Depot has not made a commitment to net-zero with Science Based Targets.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Home Depot, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 320
- Robert Bosch has set a 100% renewable energy target through Science Based Targets with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2030
- Robert Bosch has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Robert Bosch has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by Robert Bosch are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Robert Bosch has not made a commitment to net-zero with Science Based Targets.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Robert Bosch, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 320
- Continental AG has set a 100% renewable energy target through RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2040
- Continental AG has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Continental AG has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by Continental AG are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Continental AG has not made a commitment to net-zero with Science Based Targets.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Continental AG, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 310
- KB Financial Group has set a 100% renewable energy target through RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2040
- KB Financial Group has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- KB Financial Group has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by KB Financial Group are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- KB Financial Group has not made a commitment to net-zero with Science Based Targets.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including KB Financial Group, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 310
- NTT Group has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- NTT Group has committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- NTT Group has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by NTT Group are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- NTT Group has not made a commitment to net-zero with Science Based Targets.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including NTT Group, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 300
- ThyssenKrupp has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- ThyssenKrupp has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- ThyssenKrupp has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by ThyssenKrupp are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to Well-below 2°C.
- ThyssenKrupp has committed to setting net-zero Science Based Targets, but has yet to have any targets approved.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including ThyssenKrupp, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 300
- General Motors has set a 100% renewable energy target through RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2035
- General Motors has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- General Motors has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by General Motors are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C/Well-below 2°C.
- General Motors committed to develop and verify net-zero Science Based Targets through the Business Ambition for 1.5°C program when SBTi has a developed net-zero standard for this sector. Companies with commitments that are more than two years old receive no points from Spendwell for this climate ranking, no matter the reason for target setting delay.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
*Companies like General Motors that have been granted extensions for net-zero target setting are noted as committed, but receive no points for this commitment. SBTi has not finalized its net-zero standards for this company's business sector or the company was granted an extension for other reasons.
Some corporations, including General Motors, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 265
- Airbus has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- Airbus has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Airbus has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by Airbus are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Airbus has not made a commitment to net-zero with Science Based Targets.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Airbus, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 250
- Albertsons has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- Albertsons has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Albertsons has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by Albertsons are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Albertsons has not made a commitment to net-zero with Science Based Targets.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Albertsons, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 250
- ALDI has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- ALDI has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- ALDI has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by ALDI are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- ALDI has not made a commitment to net-zero with Science Based Targets.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including ALDI, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 250
- AT&T has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- AT&T has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- AT&T has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by AT&T are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- AT&T has not made a commitment to net-zero with Science Based Targets.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including AT&T, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 250
- Best Buy has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- Best Buy has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Best Buy has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by Best Buy are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Best Buy has not made a commitment to net-zero with Science Based Targets.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Best Buy, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 250
- BMW has set a 100% renewable energy target through RE100 with the following target year used for this Spendwell ranking:2050
- BMW has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- BMW has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by BMW are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C/Well-below 2°C.
- BMW committed to develop and verify net-zero Science Based Targets through the Business Ambition for 1.5°C program when SBTi has a developed net-zero standard for this sector. Companies with commitments that are more than two years old receive no points from Spendwell for this climate ranking, no matter the reason for target setting delay.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
*Companies like BMW that have been granted extensions for net-zero target setting are noted as committed, but receive no points for this commitment. SBTi has not finalized its net-zero standards for this company's business sector or the company was granted an extension for other reasons.
Some corporations, including BMW, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 250
- Cardinal Health has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- Cardinal Health has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Cardinal Health has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by Cardinal Health are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Cardinal Health has not made a commitment to net-zero with Science Based Targets.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Cardinal Health, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 250
- Cencora has not committed to 100% renewable electricity through Science Based Targets or RE100.
- Cencora has not committed to the EP100 energy efficiency program.
- Cencora has set near-term Science Based Targets covering the following GHG Protocol scopes:scope 1scope 2scope 3
- Science Based Targets has assessed the near-term commitments and targets set by Cencora are aligned with keeping the global climate change temperature increase to 1.5°C.
- Cencora has not made a commitment to net-zero with Science Based Targets.
- Phase II: Measuring the transparency of a company's climate commitments.
- Phase III: Measuring the action a company is taking to fulfill its climate commitments.
Some corporations, including Cencora, might report achieving positive climate impacts above and beyond those covered by the Science Based Targets and RE100 initiatives. Those claims are not reported here as they are not independently verifiable and/or they are not comparable commitments and achievements across this industry or sector. See the Methodology section of this report for more information about how Spendwell develops this ranking and how future considerations will qualify for inclusion.
Raw Spendwell climate score: 250
Report Disclaimer
Spendwell is a corporate accountability focused, investigative media group that sources all data used in its rankings and reports through government regulatory entities, recognized nongovernmental organizations, news media and independently verifiable company self-reporting. For this climate report, the data used in this report is sourced from the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) and the Climate Group, each of which have their own data policy/disclaimer that can be found at the following links: SBTi Disclaimer (see dashboard Key text) and the Climate Group's RE100 terms of service and the Climate Group's general/EP100 terms of service. These disclaimers also apply to the related data in this report.The veracity of the information sourced from SBTi and the Climate Group is generally excellent, but is reliant, in most instances, on information provided by companies to this NGOs. Spendwell disclaims any liability arising from use of Spendwell’s reporting, rankings or any other content on spendwell.com or otherwise provided by Spendwell. Spendwell does not provide investment advice; therefore, nothing on Spendwell.com or content otherwise provided by Spendwell should be construed as an offering of investment advice. If you believe information reported by Spendwell or included in one of Spendwell’s reports or rankings is inaccurate, please contact Spendwell through the report or ranking in question in order to request an investigation and/or editorial correction.
If you believe this report needs a correction or update, please let Spendwell know.
If you are media or have other questions regarding this report, please contact Spendwell.
Clicking either of these buttons will open your default email client.
